Home
AI
World
Politics
Health
Crime & justice
Science & technology
Social issues
Sports
Money
Entertainment
Environment/energy
Military
Culture
Weather
Media






Home
Bias Split
Public FiguresControversies

Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Free Newsletters

Sign Up!
Sign Up Now!

How our sliders workAboutContact UsNewsletter Archive
MediaFAQGlossaryPrivacy Policy
  1. Newsletters
23 July 2025

Daily Newsletter

Trump Accuses Obama of Treason Over 2016 Election Intelligence

Photo: Roberto Schmidt/AFP/Getty Images

The Facts

  • U.S. President Donald Trump accused former President Barack Obama of treason during an Oval Office meeting with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. Tuesday, claiming Obama orchestrated a conspiracy to undermine his 2016 election victory through manipulated intelligence assessments.

  • Trump's accusations came as reporters questioned him about convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, with the president describing the Russia investigation inquiries as "sort of a witch hunt" while calling for prosecution of Obama and other former officials.

  • On Friday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released declassified documents alleging Obama administration officials manufactured intelligence about Russian election interference, prompting her to submit a criminal referral to the Department of Justice.

Show more

The Spin

Republican narrative

Obama and his administration manufactured intelligence to undermine Trump's legitimate 2016 victory. The declassified documents prove they pulled an assessment showing Russia didn't impact election results and replaced it with a politicized version. This was a treasonous conspiracy that deserves criminal prosecution.

Democratic narrative

These allegations are a desperate distraction from Trump's current political problems, particularly questions about Jeffrey Epstein. The documents don't contradict established findings that Russia interfered in 2016 without altering the vote count. Multiple bipartisan investigations have confirmed Russian efforts to meddle in the election.

Nerd narrative

There's an 8% chance that there will be a U.S.-Russia war before 2050, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

See sources

Iran, Russia, China Hold Nuclear Talks Amid Sanctions Threat

Photo: POOL/AFP/Getty Images

The Facts

  • Iran hosted a trilateral meeting with Russia and China on Tuesday in Tehran to discuss regional security issues and Iran's nuclear program, as well as to coordinate responses to potential U.N. sanctions under the so-called "snapback" mechanism.

  • Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi rejected the mechanism as "illegal," claiming that the European parties had no right to take such measures after failing to fulfill their obligations following the U.S. withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal in 2018.

  • The snapback mechanism allows any signatory to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) agreement to reimpose strict international sanctions against Iran, to be enforced by all 15 members of the U.N. Security Council, should Tehran be deemed non-compliant with the JCPOA.

Show more

The Spin

Pro-Iran narrative

Iran's nuclear program represents legitimate peaceful energy development that has been unfairly targeted by severe Western sanctions and military strikes. The trilateral meeting demonstrates growing international support for Iran's sovereign rights, as Russia and China recognize the illegal nature of European threats to reimpose sanctions after they themselves failed to uphold the 2015 nuclear agreement commitments.

Anti-Iran narrative

Iran's nuclear activities pose a serious proliferation threat that requires coordinated international pressure to prevent weaponization. The trilateral meeting reveals Iran's desperation to avoid accountability through authoritarian partnerships, while the snapback mechanism provides necessary leverage to force compliance with nuclear restrictions and prevent regional destabilization.

Nerd narrative

There is a 29% chance that Iran will possess a nuclear weapon before 2030, according to the Metaculus predicition community.

See sources

Trump Announces $550B Trade Deal with Japan at 15% Tariff

Photo: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP/Getty Images

The Facts

  • President Donald Trump announced a trade agreement with Japan on Tuesday, stating the deal includes a 15% tariff on Japanese exports to the United States, down from a previously threatened 25% rate that was set to take effect Aug. 1.

  • Under the agreement, Japan will invest $550 billion in the United States, with Trump claiming the U.S. will receive 90% of the profits, though specific details of this investment structure were not immediately provided by either government.

  • The deal includes Japan opening its markets to U.S. exports of cars, trucks, rice and certain agricultural products, addressing longstanding trade barriers that had been points of contention in negotiations.

Show more

The Spin

Pro-Trump narrative

This historic trade deal represents a major victory for American workers and manufacturers. The 15% tariff rate, while still significant, provides much-needed relief from the devastating 25% rate that was looming. Japan's massive $550 billion investment commitment will create hundreds of thousands of jobs and revitalize American industry.

Anti-Trump narrative

Despite the last minute boost to markets, the overall impact of Trump's whimsical approach to global tariffs remains devastating. There was never any need to create the uncertainty and instability his policies have caused, and Trump's persistent pursuit of a 'strongman' image has come at significant costs to ordinary citizens both in and outside of the U.S.

Nerd narrative

There is a 70% chance that customs duties revenue to the federal government will increase from $80 billion in fiscal year 2023 to at least $160 billion in fiscal year 2026 (in 2023 dollars), according to the Metaculus prediction community.

See sources

UK Slashes Foreign Aid by 40% to Fund Defense Spending

Photo: Foreign and Commonwealth Office/Wikimedia Commons

The Facts

  • A recent Foreign Office report revealed that funding cuts first announced in February will affect bilateral support for children's education and women's health programs in Africa, with experts warning that marginalized communities will bear the brunt of these reductions.

  • The U.K. government five months ago announced a 40% reduction in foreign aid spending, cutting from 0.5% to 0.3% of gross national income by 2027. This is the largest aid cut in the country's history and brings spending to its lowest level since 1999.

  • Funding for multilateral organizations like the World Bank's International Development Association will be protected, receiving £1.98 billion over three years, while underperforming multilateral bodies will reportedly face future cuts.

Show more

The Spin

Pro-government narrative

These aid cuts represent a necessary shift toward strategic realism in foreign policy. The UK must prioritize national security and defense capabilities in an increasingly dangerous world, especially given pressure from allies like the United States. Traditional aid has often created dependency rather than sustainable development, and redirecting funds to defense spending better serves both British taxpayers and long-term global stability.

Opposition narrative

Slashing aid budgets means abandoning the world's most vulnerable people when they need help most. These cuts will directly cause preventable deaths, particularly among women and children in conflict zones, while undermining decades of progress in global health and education. The decision represents a betrayal of international solidarity and moral leadership at a time when humanitarian crises are escalating worldwide.

Nerd narrative

There is a 50% chance that total contributions to the Global Fund will reach at least $13.6 billion in the next year cycle (2028), according to the Metaculus prediction community.

See sources

Microsoft Claims Chinese Hackers Responsible for SharePoint Attacks

Photo: Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images

The Facts

  • Microsoft alleged on Tuesday that three Chinese hacking groups have been exploiting vulnerabilities in on-premises SharePoint servers to breach organizations worldwide since at least July 7, 2025.

  • The company identified two of the "threat actors" as Chinese-state groups Linen Typhoon and Violet Typhoon, and a third it named Storm-2603. According to Microsoft, the hackers exploited a SharePoint spoofing vulnerability, CVE-2025-49706, and a remote code execution vulnerability, CVE-2025-49704.

  • The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and watchdog Eye Security claim that the vulnerabilities allow hackers to fully access SharePoint content, remotely execute code, and potentially steal cryptographic keys — granting persistent access to compromised systems.

Show more

The Spin

Anti-China narrative

Microsoft's research shows that culpability for the attacks on SharePoint rests solely with Chinese state-affiliated and China-based hackers, who aim to compromise customers' accounts, files, and data. Users, therefore, must ensure their security by downloading the latest patches and taking all necessary action to mitigate against this new threat.

Pro-China narrative

Cybercrime is a challenge that confronts the entire world, and is a threat that China is committed to combating at every turn. At the same time, however, China opposes the rash accusations made by Microsoft, falsely attributing the SharePoint cyberattacks to China. Microsoft should instead wait for more substantive evidence before jumping to conclusions.

Nerd narrative

There is an 87% chance that the U.S. will pass legislation that requires cybersecurity around AI models before 2030, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

See sources

UN's Top Court Rules Climate Action a Legal Obligation

Photo: Unsplash

The Facts

  • The International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivered a landmark advisory opinion on Wednesday declaring that a "clean, healthy and sustainable environment" is a human right and that countries failing to protect the climate system may violate international law.

  • The court rejected the "lex specialis" argument from developed nations, which claimed that existing climate treaties, such as the Paris Agreement, should be the exclusive legal framework for climate obligations, affirming that customary international law still applies.

  • ICJ President Yuji Iwasawa stated that greenhouse gas emissions are "unequivocally caused by human activities" and have cross-border effects, emphasizing that climate change poses an "urgent and existential threat" to humanity.

Show more

The Spin

Narrative A

This ruling marks a watershed moment for climate justice, as it finally establishes clear legal obligations for major polluters who have long evaded accountability. The court's rejection of the "lex specialis" argument means wealthy nations can no longer hide behind weak climate treaties to avoid responsibility for their historical emissions. Small island states and vulnerable communities now have a powerful legal foundation to demand reparations and force immediate action from the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitters.

Narrative B

The ICJ's advisory opinion, although symbolically important, remains non-binding and doesn't create new legal obligations beyond existing climate agreements, such as the Paris Agreement. Previous climate treaties already provide the appropriate legal framework for addressing emissions, and this opinion doesn't fundamentally change those established international commitments. The focus should remain on implementing existing agreements rather than creating new legal pathways that could complicate ongoing diplomatic efforts.

Nerd narrative

There's a 50% chance that the 2°C climate threshold will be crossed by April 2044, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

See sources

Spain Proposes Overhaul of Franco-Era Secrets Law

Photo: Pablo Blazquez Dominguez/Getty Images

The Facts

  • Spain's government introduced a bill Tuesday to declassify all state documents over 45 years old, which would include information on the Francisco Franco dictatorship and replace the outdated classification system dating back to his 1939–1975 rule.

  • Franco ruled Spain as a dictator from the conclusion of the Spanish Civil War to his death in 1975, when Spain transitioned to democracy. Declassification could shed light on the regime's relationship with Nazi Germany and the locations of mass graves, among other issues.

  • The law would permit documents labeled "secret" to be released after 45 years, "confidential" after seven to nine years and "restricted" after four to five years. Extensions are set only to be granted if there are national security issues, and "Highly classified" documents will remain secret for 60 years.

Show more

The Spin

Left narrative

Spain has long been haunted by the shadow of a brutal dictatorship, and it's time for the country to start slowly peeling back the facade erected by the Franco regime and their enablers. This is only the beginning of true reconciliation, which must also involve finally giving justice to Franco's victims. The upsurge in nostalgic support for Francoism could be stopped if its ugly truth could be revealed.

Right narrative

While many of Franco's actions can and should be condemned, the socialist regimes that preceded and succeeded him, including the current Sanchez government, have been either just as bad or rewritten history to make the right look worse. Late 20th-century historians have worked in tandem with liberal European governments to portray every right-wing government as evil and left-wing governments as saintly. History should be written by truth seekers, not politicians.

Nerd narrative

There is a 95% chance that Pedro Sánchez will still be prime minister of Spain at the end of 2025, according to the Metaculus prediction community.

See sources

Over 100 Aid Groups Warn of 'Mass Starvation' in Gaza

Photo: Ahmad Salem/Bloomberg/Getty Images

The Facts

  • Over 100 aid organizations, including Save the Children and Doctors Without Borders, released a joint statement on Wednesday warning of "mass starvation" in Gaza due to alleged Israeli restrictions on aid entering the strip, as cases of starvation and malnutrition spike.

  • Local health officials in Gaza have said at least 43 Palestinians have died of starvation since Saturday. The World Food Programme (WFP) said that nearly a third of Gaza's population had gone multiple days in a row without eating.

  • Israel dismissed the warning, claiming that aid "organizations are serving the propaganda of Hamas." Israel blamed the U.N. for not distributing aid waiting to enter Gaza, though aid organizations have repeatedly noted difficulties in delivering it to Gaza due to alleged Israeli restrictions and military operations.

Show more

The Spin

Pro-establishment narrative

Israel needs to let more aid into Gaza. Though Israel's security concerns are legitimate, the fact that Palestinians are starving to death is unacceptable. Allowing in a token amount of aid, which Israel has done since May, has not significantly improved the humanitarian situation. Indeed, both sides need to make concessions so that a ceasefire can be fully implemented and the hostages are returned.

Pro-Israel narrative

In contrast to the ludicrous claims made by pro-Hamas activists, Hamas has systematically stolen aid and caused Gaza's humanitarian crisis. Israel has even released video evidence of Hamas members looting aid trucks, yet international agencies continue to falsely claim that Hamas is not involved. Since day one, the primary driver of Gaza's suffering is Hamas.

Pro-Palestine narrative

It should be clear after almost two years of grinding brutality that Israel's true goal is to destroy Gaza and starve its people. Indeed, starvation is an integral part of Israel's genocidal campaign. Children are starving to death in their mothers' arms, yet the United States and international community have failed to end this travesty.

See sources

US State Dept Opens Harvard Student Visa Investigation

Photo: Cassandra Klos/Bloomberg/Getty Images

The Facts

  • U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday announced that the State Department has opened an investigation into Harvard University's continued eligibility as a sponsor for the Exchange Visitor Program.

  • Rubio said the investigation will examine whether Harvard's handling of exchange visitors runs "contrary to" U.S. interests and whether the university complies with all regulations, including "conducting programs that do not undermine foreign policy objectives or compromise national security interests of the United States."

  • A Harvard spokesperson responded that the school "is committed to continuing to comply with the applicable Exchange Visitor Program regulations."

Show more

The Spin

Republican narrative

Harvard has repeatedly failed to create a safe environment for its Jewish students and hasn't done enough to punish those who were involved in the anti-Israel protests. These investigations, as well as other actions taken by the administration, are necessary to ensure taxpayer-funded programs don't undermine America's interests.

Democratic narrative

The Trump administration is conducting an unlawful retaliation campaign against Harvard for refusing to surrender its academic independence. The administration's many actions against Harvard are nothing more than an attempt to control an academic institution and squelch diverse viewpoints rather than conduct legitimate oversight.

See sources

Previous newsletter

22 July 2025

Philippine trade deal, US UNESCO withdrawal and Ozzy Osbourne death

Next newsletter

24 July 2025

China-EU summit, Ghislaine Maxwell subpoena and Hulk Hogan death