Former WaPo editor reveals 'proof' of Trump’s 'backroom deal' with Amazon founder: report
AlterNetOCT 2024
The Post's decision to refrain from endorsing a presidential candidate is a step toward true journalistic neutrality. It allows readers to form their own opinions without undue influence from the paper. The allegations of a quid pro quo are baseless and ignore the publisher's stated reasons for the decision.
The decision not to endorse a candidate is a cowardly move that undermines democracy. It's a clear example of corporate interests bowing to political pressure, potentially sacrificing journalistic integrity for financial gain. This sets a dangerous precedent for media self-censorship and could further erode press freedom.
© 2025 Improve the News Foundation.
All rights reserved.
Version 6.15.1