Disney Shareholders Seek Internal Records on Kimmel Suspension

14 HOURS AGO·UPDATED 11 HOURS AGO

story

Above: Jimmy Kimmel at Disney’s 77th Emmy Awards Party in Los Angeles on Sept. 14, 2025. Image copyright: Chad Salvador/Variety/Getty Images

The Spin

Left narrative

Disney shareholders are rightfully demanding transparency because the company caved to political pressure from Trump's administration rather than protecting shareholder interests and free speech principles. The suspension caused Disney's stock to drop 3.3% and triggered damaging boycotts, proving the decision was driven by government overreach rather than business logic. Disney's board potentially breached fiduciary duties by prioritizing political appeasement over profits and constitutional values.

Democracy Defenders Fund

Right narrative

Disney’s suspension of Jimmy Kimmel was a business- and fact-driven decision, not an attack on free speech. Kimmel falsely claimed Charlie Kirk’s assassin was MAGA-affiliated, sparking outrage and causing over 60 ABC affiliates to preempt his show. Disney acted to protect its brand, affiliates, and viewers, while the Left selectively defends free speech only when it suits their politics. The board prioritized responsibility over political appeasement, not censorship.

The Spectator Australia