CIA Faces Subpoena Over Seized JFK, MKUltra Files

Were the files seized to hide dark secrets or is the entire story fabricated partisan theater?
CIA Faces Subpoena Over Seized JFK, MKUltra Files
Above: Tulsi Gabbard testifying at a House Select Intelligence Committee hearing on March 19. Image credit: Andrew Harnik/Staff/Getty Images

The Facts

  • Two Republican lawmakers visited CIA headquarters on Thursday to investigate the agency's removal of roughly 40 boxes of JFK assassination and MKUltra files from facilities under the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which were being processed for declassification.
  • CIA whistleblower James Erdman III, a roughly 20-year agency veteran, testified before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Wednesday, alleging the CIA took back the boxes from ODNI and illegally monitored the computers and phones of investigators working under ODNI authority.
  • DNI Press Secretary Olivia Coleman denied reports of a raid, writing on X, "This is false — the CIA did not raid the DNI's office." Rep. Anna Paulina Luna later clarified the incident was not a same-day raid but maintained the CIA took documents "ODNI has jurisdiction over."

Sources Split


The Spin


Narrative A

The CIA snatched forty boxes of JFK and MKUltra files from Tulsi Gabbard's office to bury proof of its past crimes. This move defies a presidential order for full release and blocks Congress from records it demanded. Subpoenas must force every file into public view right now.

Narrative B

Claims of a CIA raid on the director of national intelligence office are pure fiction and partisan theater. Officials confirm no seizure occurred and the story rests on unreliable testimony from a subpoenaed witness. No files require return since the alleged action never took place.


© 2026 Improve the News Foundation. All rights reserved.Version 7.17.1

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.

All rights reserved.

Version 7.17.1