Moscow Dismisses Claims Over Second Case of Plague, WHO Seeks Answers
Should Russia's stonewalling raise suspicions or does misreporting risk unjustified panic?
Story
Above: A woman walks past the consumer and health watchdog Rospotrebnadzor's headquarters in Moscow, on Oct. 5. Image credit: Igor Ivanko/AFP/Getty Images
The Facts
- World Health Organization (WHO) officials said Wednesday that they cannot complete a full risk assessment of a Russian lab worker's death from suspected pneumonic plague, as Moscow dismissed reports of a suspected second case.
- WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said transparent information sharing was essential to clarify conflicting reports concerning the death of 28-year-old Darya Shipilova, who was an employee of Irkutsk Anti-plague Research Institute of Siberia and the Far East.
- Russia's health watchdog Rospotrebnadzor claimed Wednesday that there were no epidemic risks to the population, reporting that more than 90% of identified contacts of Shipilova had completed medical observation and that nearly 5,000 laboratory tests found no dangerous pathogens connected to her death.
Sources Split
LEFT
CENTER
RIGHT
+2
+1
+1
+2
ESTAB
CRIT
CENTER
PRO
ESTAB
The Spin
Pro-establishment narrative
When a worker at a high-security pathogen lab dies and nobody can say what caused it, the whole world has a stake in the answer. Vague assurances and missed reporting deadlines are exactly how a local scare turns into a global crisis, as the last pandemic made painfully clear. Stonewalling the health authorities is right to be met with suspicion.
Establishment-critical narrative
Thousands of lab tests turning up nothing is real evidence — rumors scraped off social media are not. Reporting in this case went through the proper health channels, and bioweapon talk says more about geopolitics than science. Hyping unconfirmed conjecture around this case only fuels the panic that sound public health works to prevent.
