SCOTUS Weighs FCC Fines on AT&T, Verizon

Did the FCC rightfully punish AT&T and Verizon for sharing location data or unconstitutionally bypass due process?
SCOTUS Weighs FCC Fines on AT&T, Verizon
Above: An AT&T Inc store in Manhattan, New York City. Image credit: Nicolas Economou/NurPhoto/Getty Images

The Facts

  • The Supreme Court heard arguments in consolidated cases FCC v. AT&T and Verizon Communications v. FCC on Tuesday, examining whether the FCC's method of imposing fines violated the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.
  • The FCC fined AT&T $57 million and Verizon nearly $47 million for allegedly sharing customers' real-time location data with third parties without consent, in violation of the Telecommunications Act.
  • The Trump administration defended the FCC's forfeiture orders, arguing they are nonbinding and that companies could seek a jury trial by declining to pay and waiting for the Justice Department to file a civil lawsuit.

Sources Split


The Spin


Narrative A

AT&T and Verizon sold customers' sensitive location data without proper protections, and the FCC was right to fine them. The carriers don't even deny the wrongdoing — they just want to dodge accountability by gaming the legal process. Stripping the FCC of enforcement power leaves tens of millions of Americans with no real protection when telecom giants misuse their most personal data.

Narrative B

The FCC skipped the constitutionally required process by issuing massive fines without letting AT&T and Verizon contest the charges before a jury. The Seventh Amendment exists precisely to prevent government agencies from acting as judge, jury and executioner against regulated companies. Letting the FCC bypass federal court sets a dangerous precedent for unchecked regulatory power over major industries.



The Controversies


© 2026 Improve the News Foundation. All rights reserved.Version 7.18.2

© 2026 Improve the News Foundation.

All rights reserved.

Version 7.18.2